How the Jewish people were invented, from the Bible to Zionism is the provocative title of the most recent book to be published in Israel by Shlomo Sand, a professor at Tel Aviv University (forthcoming in French with Fayard). Sand, one of the "new" historians, attacks what he calls the myth that the Jews are the descendants of the Hebrews, exiled from the kingdom of Judaea. He has attempted to show that the Jews are neither a race nor a nation, but ancient pagans – in the main Berbers from North Africa, Arabs from the south of Arabia, and Turks from the Khazar empire – who converted to Judaism between the fourth and eighth centuries CE. According to Sand, the Palestinians are probably descended from Hebrews who embraced Islam or Christianity.
Bearing in mind that Le Diplo is a left-wing publication, and thus slightly more pro-Palestinian than the Western mainstream, it is quite a curious book. The French edition is not out yet, and I've heard nothing about plans for an English edition, so I guess it might be time to brush up on my French.
Just as the British population is probably substantially Celtic, even after the Anglo-Saxon, Danish and Norman invasions, it would make sense that the population of Ottoman Palestine is still substantially Jewish in origin. It all depends on how much the local population is decimated during the Crusades, of course, as well as hinging on Sand's assertion that the Roman-era diaspora was not as pervasive as thought.
Considering Sephardic Jews held on to their identity even after their expulsion from post-Reconquista Spain, and Ashkenazi Jews persisted despite centuries of pogroms, one has always wondered what happened to the Berber, Yemeni and Khazar Jews. It would make sense that some of these, at least, retain their Jewish identities.
Depending on when matrilineal descent was adopted, we could potentially verify, based on mtDNA analysis, whether Sand's hypothesis is right or not. Naturally, regardless of whether the Jewish people are descended from the biblical Jews or not, does not matter: the centuries of persecution have forged a common identity, just as decades of persecution forged Palestinian nationhood.
It's hard to believe that Le Monde, usually an excellent publication, would give space to a review of this trash.
I'm not Jewish myself, but I don't believe that Israeli Jews all claim to be descendants of the ancient Hebrews, neither do I believe that Israel was/is founded on a purley ethnic base, as the Jewish people worldwide are not so much an ethnicity (except within Israel itself, perhaps) than a shared culture. After all, it is perfectly possible to convert to Judaism and become Jewish. Then there are different sub-cultures depending upon where the Jewish families lived over the years that add to the unique mix that is Judaism.
Calling Jews an 'invented' people is as insulting and preposterous as calling Muslims, Christians, or Hindus 'invented.'
This is Le Monde Diplomatique, which tends to be to the left of the parent publication Le Monde, which controls only 51% of the stock. They even reviewed 9/11 conspiracy theories in the past! As I said, take it with a grain of salt.
The phrasing is rather unfortunate, but I guess what he's driving at is that in modern times, Jewishness is not an ethnicity, it's a religion/culture. The same thing is actually happening among British Muslims -- they identify themselves as either Muslim first and British second, or vice versa, and their ethnic identity third. I don't speak Hebrew so I can't translate the original title -- I'd think there's a (intentional?) mistranslation into English.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |