Visit hircus's column >>

HIRCUSHome Page

Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 9; Links Seeded: 386
Member Since: 9/2007Last Seen: 7/19/2009

Speculate to accumulate, by Serge Halimi

advertisement

The International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organisation promised that more trade would help to eradicate poverty and hunger. Foodcrops? Self-sufficiency in food? They had a better idea. Local farms would be closed down or encouraged to concentrate on exports. This would make the most, not of natural conditions which might be good for growing tomatoes in Mexico or pineapples in the Philippines, but of the fact that production costs are lower in Mexico and the Philippines than they are in Florida or California.

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
0.5
{"commentId":1797245,"authorDomain":"hircus"}
Farmers in Mali would rely on more highly mechanised, more productive producers in the Beauce or the Midwest for grain supplies. The farmers would pack up, move into town and get jobs in some western firm that had relocated to take advantage of cheaper labour than it could find at home. The countries on the East African seaboard would lighten their load of foreign debt by selling their fishing rights to the factory ships of wealthier countries. The Guineans would import tinned fish from Denmark or Portugal. Never mind the additional pollution generated by transporting all these goods. A life of bliss was guaranteed and so were the profits of the middlemen – wholesalers, shippers, insurers, advertisers.

One could beg to differ -- surely globalisation could be a positive thing, provided all the costs are factored in. If means of transportation (whether freight or passenger) are taxed based on their carbon emissions, and market-distorting subsidies that benefit mostly large agricultural combines are axed, we should see more local production, while still avoiding the autarkic extremes of North Korea and communist-era Albania.

{"commentId":1797245,"threadId":"264046","contentId":"1486770","authorDomain":"hircus"}
    Reply#1 - Tue May 13, 2008 8:43 PM EDT
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"264046","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"264046","contentId":"1486770"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking